lmn:isr
Differenze
Queste sono le differenze tra la revisione selezionata e la versione attuale della pagina.
| Entrambe le parti precedenti la revisioneRevisione precedenteProssima revisione | Revisione precedente | ||
| lmn:isr [30/12/2013 18:07] – davide.orsi | lmn:isr [30/12/2013 18:09] (versione attuale) – davide.orsi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linea 1: | Linea 1: | ||
| + | ====== Oscillating needle technique ====== | ||
| + | {{ lmn: | ||
| + | The instrument is designed to measure the mechanical response of a Langmuir monolayer to an external shear deformation. | ||
| + | The instrument is a custom-made apparatus analogous to the one recently | ||
| + | developed by the group of Gerald Fuller [@Brooks1999 @Reynaert2008]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The stress exerted by the needle on the film is equal to the shear | ||
| + | oscillating force (with amplitude $F$), divided by two times the length | ||
| + | $L$ of the magnetic needle. The resulting shear strain $\gamma$ is equal | ||
| + | to the needle oscillation amplitude $X$, divided by the distance $W$ | ||
| + | between the needle and the channel that delimits the investigated | ||
| + | portion of the film. The oscillations of $\gamma$ and $\sigma$ are | ||
| + | separated by a phase lag $\delta$. The dynamic modulus is then given by: | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$G(\omega)=\frac{\sigma(\omega)}{\gamma(\omega)}= \frac{W}{2L}\frac{F(\omega)}{X(\omega)}e^{i\delta}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | This experimental technique presents some limitations, | ||
| + | intrinsic design. A measurement performed on a film characterized by a | ||
| + | low value of $G$ may be strongly affected by contributions from the drag | ||
| + | of the water subphase. At the same time, the technique is not suited to | ||
| + | measure the response of very rigid films: the high force required to | ||
| + | move the needle may induce undesired non-linear effects in the | ||
| + | measurements of $G$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The low limits of the dynamic range of the instrument is usually related | ||
| + | to the so-called **Boussinesq number**, defined as the ratio between the | ||
| + | drag due to the film at the interface, and the drag due to the subphase, | ||
| + | that affect the movement of the needle at the interface. It is expressed | ||
| + | as | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | $$B = \frac{d_{film}}{d_ {subphase}} = \frac{\eta_s \: P \: L_b}{\eta_b \: A \: L_s}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ lmn: | ||
| + | |||
| + | where $\eta_s$ and $\eta_b$ are the viscosities of the film and of the | ||
| + | subphase, $A$ and $P$ are the area and the perimeter of the contact | ||
| + | region between the needle and the film, $L_s$ and $L_b$ are the lengths | ||
| + | over which the velocity fields vary in the film and in the bulk. | ||
| + | Depending on the value of $B$, three regimes can be roughly identified: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * if $B \gg 1$, the effect of the subphase on the measurement of $G$ are negligible; | ||
| + | |||
| + | * if $B \ll 1$, the needle is probing the flow properties of the subphase; | ||
| + | |||
| + | * an intermediate regime for $B \simeq 1$, where the interpretation of the measurement of the shear modulus $G$ has to account in some way the contributions due to the drag of the subphase. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Resources ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | - [[lmn: | ||
| + | - To operate the instrument, please follow this {{lmn: | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <script type=" | ||
| + | MathJax.Hub.Config({ | ||
| + | tex2jax: {inlineMath: | ||
| + | }); | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <script type=" | ||
| + | </ | ||
